Who was my mother Else and how was she?  

She was born in 1947 and was the oldest of 4 sisters and a brother. I think she was around 168 tall, natural slim body. She was a kind, sensitive, goodhearted and gentle woman like women often are, and her children was most important for her after she married and got children. 
When she grew up her family didn’t live in luxury but they were privileged in a way through my grandparents and their parents. One of her grandparents was shipowner with a  company that, as far as I know, owned 5-6 drycargo and/or bulkships (may have been more while her grandfather ran it). It was a small shipping company compared with many others in Norway, but it was a family business that came from his father that was split into several shipping companies on more brothers. Her father inherited and ran a farm with her brother now owned by her brother/children. Her parents often resided in the farm in weekends, where also sisters with families visited and spent time sometimes. It is/was a beautiful farm located by the largest lake in Norway Mjoesa in the country of Hedmark Her great grandfather was also quite wellknown for his engagment in sports as he was president of the organizing committee during the Olympic games in Oslo in 1952. In a way their family was also privileged for that reason, and in winter holidays spent time  on then a beautiful cabin I think was called the OL cabin by someone. It was located in Uvdal. On the time it was built it was a large cabin. Today maybe a bit larger the normal. Their family had many places to go to in holidays and was privileged also in that way. Her grandfather was a quite well known and respected man in Norway because of his different engagements, and because of ancestors history. 

My mother met my father at Oslo Handelsgymnasium. They later went to university in Mannheim together and married when they came back to Norway.  
They bought a house in Hundsundveien at Snaroya near Oslo and got me and my brother and sister. After sometime my father started working for the family shipping company and he and my mother was given the role to manage and operate the company together with her grandparents and parents, and parents after her grandfather past away. I also think she was part owner in the company before my parents divorced linked to the role my father and her had or was intended to have. 
When our family moved to Hong Kong for half a year on the 80s  It had to do with that the company moved its “office” to Hong Kong and that the ships started sailing under other flag. The company then also taxed to another country which is of course legal.  

After my parents divorce they handed over their roles through my grandpartents  to an uncle and aunt who also moved to Hong Kong  for some time.  

In second half of the nineties when her father passed away a decision was made to end the family shipping  business. Because the company had income to another country there naturally was money on foreign accounts. That was also legal.  

Our family moved after my mother’s divorce. The first time we moved from Snaroya, after we returned from Hong Kong after half a year there, to an apartment at Ullern. From there we moved to a house at Vinderen my mother and her new husband bought. Our father moved from another apartment at Ullern to Kristiansand. After our mother’s second divorce we moved to another address at Vinderen. Thereafter to an apartment at Ullern and from there again to a house at Vinderen around 1996. Looking back on can say there were too many moves but that was how it was.   

A personal matter for our family not relevant to others: Development of PTSD 

The reason for why I share details in this section is the attempt by someone to create wrong perceptions, and to give an insight in some details that played a role for my mother's psychology. 

The man my mother married after she and my father divorced iin the 1980s was no poor man. He came from a family with a name well-known from the industrial age in Norway and abroad for fly fishing gear. I don’t think “he had as much as” my mother if she and my father had continued run the company with my grandparents but that was not an issue for our mother and not well-known. Her family knew. 

There were no “hard feelings” from my mother’s side when it comes to this. I, my brother and sister were too small to understand that and it was perceived as a natural development by us all when an aunt and uncle later took over their roles in the company. 

Another matter is that I later in life after my mother’s many stays in psychiatric hospital have wondered about what was the cause of the mistreatment with a wrong kind of medicine over so long time so many times. 

After her grandfather passed away in the 80s, before my mother and father divorced, I wonder if our mother inherited a part ownership in the shipping company when her grandfather  (my great grandfather) passed away. It would not have been strange if something had been written in his will about that. Regardless of whether or not it was I think it would be strange or abnormal if none of her sisters and neither her brother, people they were married to or other relatives, felt a kind of “unfairness” about that my father with my mother on his side were supposed to continue run the company with my grandparents. Other siblings had no ownership in the company. I know nothing about emotions of my grandmother’s brother’s family about inheritance from their father. 

Not a long time before my mother and father of my half brother separated, my stepfather then who like my father is a good man in his ways, my mother one day before 1990 signed a paper "in Blanco" for her father. The paper had to do with the shipping company. That may have been start on a “ psychotic development” and on a history of wrong treatment based on ill emotions of people who had emotions about that. 

It was not long time after she was given a psychotic diagnosis a first time. I think that somehow had to do with the in Blanco" paper she signed. The father of my half brother may have been unhappy about that. I also wonder if the in Blanco paper gave someone in my mother’s family irrational thoughts and emotions and if someone had an interest in that she got a psychosis diagnosis after she had signed.  

After the separation she suffered some time from depression. She got help to recover from that in the hospital she was patient in. I also think she then had symptoms of psychosis she probably got as a consequence of missing sleep because of fear/anxiety. 

After 1996 some people outside our family, who were not psychiatrists or doctors, were too quick to mean she was psychotic and that had to do with the disagreement between my cousin and me.  The problem then was that her main problem was the anxiety she had for involuntary inhibitions and medication and the psychiatrists in the hospital she had been patient in didn’t understand that. She had a kind of PTSD as a consequence of earlier involuntary treatments. What she needed before she got worse with psychotic symptoms was just a medicine to ensure that she got enough sleep and secondly may be a medicine that helped her deal sometimes with her anxiety. She often had anxiety. 
Anxiety was her main problem but psychiatrists in the hospital never acknowledged that. Her main problem was not psychosis but she got symptoms after missing sleep as consequence of fear and or anxiety. The hospital made a major mistake in that regard, possibly because people related to my cousin meant she was psychotic. 

Antipsychotic medicines she was forced to take in periods can make people easier to influence upon in some ways. I know from own experience that one in a way think less independently because the effect of the medicine is that the mind is imprisoned in a way. If someone had suggested something, or threatened her in a way while on such medicines, that means she would be more vulnerable to “saying yes” to somethings that she otherwise would have said no to. She was anyway vulnerable for that someone who connected to my PC could abuse her anxiety and threaten her with involuntary inhibitions and medication, and use it to blackmail her.

These details of course had nothing to do with that happened on 22nd July. She passed away 4 years before 22nd July and has, like other mothers and grandmothers, never had a motive to harm young people in the way Breivik did.
Only very ill people who don't understand what a motive is would think differently. I will later share more thoughts about that.

 
Wenche Behring and the dog 

Around 2003 she sold the house at Vinderen and bought an apartment in Hoff Terraase where she lived until she passed away in 2007. She did not know Wenche Behring when she moved there, who lived in an apartment 100 meters away in another street with the name Hoffsveien. The building society had 5-8 brick wall buildings with 218 apartments. From one end of the property to the other it was 50-100 meters. There was especially a grocery store in the area close to the apartments that was convenient for people who lived there to buy grocery products.  
I don’t think Wenche Behring was the same age as my mother but not very far from.  Naturally people who shopped there sometimes said hallo to each other. Wenche Behring also had a small dog. The dog was naturally starting point for talks Wenche Behring had with different people and led to small talk. The first time I saw her was in the grocery store while shopping with my mother. My mother said hallo to her and so did I. They did not “know each other” beyond that.  Minutes after we had left the grocery store I asked my mother for her name. The reason for why I did that was that my mother had been admitted so many times to a psychiactric hospital and because there was reason to question if someone consciously tried to make her ill sometimes, linked to a disagreement between me and one of my cousins concerning stock we bought in 1996.  I asked for being protective of my mother. I  thereafter took a note of the woman’s name  In a  file on my pc.  
This was in 2005. She had then only lived in the area for a year or two and our mother was patient in a Psychiatric hospital at Vinderen in Oslo. She had spent time there in periods. She had not met Wenche Behring before.  

2005 was the year I started my sports project, and the year I contacted Anne Cathrine Eriksen after a “look up” in yellow pages and after I had called another company first. 
Her one person company had the name Nettapp As. She sounded like a reliable and good person on phone, we made an appointment to meet at her office in Osterdalsgata at Vaalerenga in Oslo and met there soon after. We also then signed an agreement soon after. The initial plan and “assignment” was to 
make a website that made it easier to find an opponent to compete in some sports/games. I new little then about Anne Cathrine Eriksen and Nettapp As. 
I got a loan from my father of around 90000 kroners in 2005 for the project. That was not formalized and by mistake not reported to tax authorities by me, but the money of course came from legal sources and was taxed. After some time I realized she outsourced programming tasks to a company in Pakistan, which seemed to work fine, and she told me that she had a brother in the Asker area who ran a shop selling sailing boats. I visited his office once early in the project to tell him about the project during a time I thought about finding an investor for the project. After the meeting I reasoned that it was a bit too early. I wanted to work more on plans and feel more confident about a prototype before I exposed other people by taking money from them for part ownership. 

My brother, sister and half brother didn’t  know who Wenche Behring was and none of us knew her son. I was the only one of us who saw  Wenche Behring  some times I was in the area where my mother lived. My sister was actively engaged in marriage with child/children and husband, my half brother lived another place and so did my brother with his girlfriend/wife. Our mother lived by herself in the apartment. I then lived in a small apartment 45-60 minutes with Bus from Skoyen in an area call Rykkinn in the municipality of Baerum.  

Our mother had nothing to do with Wenche Behring. They were independent owners in the building society and independent 
customers in the local grocery store who lived in different apartments 100 meters apart. They never ate lunch or dinner together and never met as friends to be social together. Naturally all neighbours in the building society went for walks in the area for example to the shop, to a car, just for a walk or to public transportation. Unavoidable then not to sometimes pass other people who lived there. Because Wenche Behring had a dog our mother probably also said hallo for that reason when Wenche Behring and the dog was out walking. My mother had a dog herself sine years before and loved dogs. 
 
People rarely or never perceive women as dangerous. Our mother was definitely no dangerous woman. People who met on her perceived her as a normal, kind and good hearted woman. Even though the hospital she was patient at tried or wanted to help her she was victim of mistreatment over many years. In her last years she also had a back problem as a consequence of the wrong medicines she was forced to take in periods. I can say for sure that she had no evil plans when she passed away in 2007. She neither had will nor capacity to do something “evil” before she passed away. Her mind was focused at the problems she struggled with and on family. She especially enjoyed that my sister had got a child/children and to be a grandmother. People who think differently are psychotic. 

Had she wanted to “attack someone physically” it would have been people in the hospital who forced her to take a wrong medicine or people who caused problems in her life. Such was naturally not an option for her. Another matter was that abuse of her medical history, with fear of more involuntary stay and medication naturally made her express thoughts sometimes. She was no danger to anyone. 

Her time in Hoff Terrasse 

During the time she lived in Hoff Terrasse she and our family were vulnerable in a way. The antipsychotic medicines, which was wrong to give her over long periods of time, damaged much for her. From my own experience, and my own battles, I know that the effect of such medicine is imprisoning of ones thoughts. When a person also is forced to stay in a hospital it is like being double prisoned. Giving such medicine to people for a limited time, if someone is psychotic when inhibited may be ok and right, but not by force over months. Not acceptable in my opinion. The medicines made it worse for our mother even though the hospital also helped her in some ways. She was mistreated over many years by the hospital for that reason and that affected our family. 
I suspect that someone ill from  outside our family influenced on doctors or psychiatrists on the hospital to give her antipsychotic medicine . Possibly someone who didn’t want a court trial about the stock in Global Money Games. If my brother, half-brother, sister expressed thoughts about medicines it was a matter of understanding she needed a kind of help. Not about what kind of medicine that would be right for her. They did nothing wrong when it comes to this but helped her in ways they could. Concerns they reported to the hospital were correct and they were the most important support for her. For example when she called my brother(s)/sister in the middle of the night because of anxiety and sleep problems. Giving her right kind of medicines and help was the job of people at the hospitals. 

The disagreement with my cousin that had caused a psychological “knot” in our family got her inhibited by force to the hospital several times after 1996.   It was my cousin and aunt who tied the knot by their ignorance. They could easily have solved the problem in a way many times but didn’t because they had a missing understanding of responsibility and didn’t take time to solve the problem. They probably also had wrong thoughts concerning the disagreement, and may have thought there was a conspiracy linked to a court trial between my cousins mother and stepfather concerning a divorce settlement. It was not. But their way of relating to us and her gave good reason especially for her not to be supportive of our aunt during the trial but of her husband. Her medical history was played on by someone from outside our family.  

People our mother had contact with were first of all family.  

In 2005 I had no idea that someone probably connected to my pc and stole data in that way. Data someone stole and abused was primarily a matter of data I deleted, never saved and never shared with anyone.  It may have had to do with Global Money Games and fear someone had for a trial, or to do with Leila Jorgensen’s husband after Leila Jorgensen told me he was involved in dealing of illegal drugs. 

When I visited my mother between 2005 and 2007 I took a bus from outside Oslo to Skoyen. I sometimes did it once a week, sometimes not as often. 
From August 2005 I frequently had meetings with Anne Cathrine Eriksen about the sports project I had started in her small office in Osterdalsgata 1 at Vaalerenga in Oslo. We had regular meetings until 2011. My one small one man entity then was one of several customers she had that had a need for making and/or running a website. Her small company had the name Nettapp As. She forwarded  programing jobs to a company in Pakistan with the name Digitalspinners. 

 DigitalSpinners (sometimes abbreviated DS) of course had nothing to do with the family shipping company O.Ditlev-Simonsen (ODS). Neither had money I spent on the project that were legal money that came from/through me. This can or could have been proven. 

My mother passed away in April 2007. As far as my brother, half brother and sister knew she took her life as a consequence of the suffering she had with involuntary wrong medication and involuntary inhibition to the hospital(s) many times and because of the back problems she struggled with for some time.  

My mother’s funeral and Wenche Behring in first quarter 2010 

Before her funeral we or other relatives naturally contacted people who had known her and had a relation to her during her life, besides the death for her in a Norwegian newspaper.  Wenche Behring was not one of them so she was not contacted.  
After the funeral I thought about if there was someone my mother had contact with who we hadn’t contacted. I then thought of a few people and the person in the neighbourhood Wenche Behring was one of them. I not long time after the funeral took a note of that in my list of doings in which I listed both private and work doings. My sports project was work. The reason for that was that I naturally thought she wondered where my mother was after she passed away. I took a note to call her and had looked up her phone number on the internet. I delayed the phone call because I had many other on my mind and because I didn’t “know her”. Other things had higher priority in my life.  

Because our mother ended her own life as far as I, my brother, half brother and sister knew after her passing away and because I in a way felt it would be good to meet someone independent of family who had met my  mother independently of the disagreement I had with one of my cousin that caused problems for our family, I eventually picked up my phone and called her after looking at my doings list in first quarter 2010. In the short conversation we had I suggested to meet for a cup of coffee only to talk about my mother. She may have been busy when I called and for that reason didn’t make an appointment.  
I had then done what was most important with regard to notes in my list of doings that was to call her, even though it was a long time after her passing away. That was an emotional thing for me. As far as I can remember I said sorry to her for not having called sooner about her passing away. After the phone call I more or less “forgot about her”. 

I did not know then that she had a son with the name Anders Behring Breivik. 
She had said in a “small talk” she had a son with the name Anders. 
During one of my visits to my mother I once sat on my mother’s veranda with my mother. It was not long time after I had been given a grant to the sports project from Innovation Norway not long before my mother passed away in 2007. Wenche Behring had wanted to take a look at my mother’s apartment and was invited in to see. There was limited space on the veranda and not room for 3 people to sit there then (today the apartments have new and larger verandas).  My mother opened the entry door for her and returned to the veranda. Wenche Behring came after and didn’t sit down but stood in the veranda door entrance while talking with us. Then she mentioned she had a son with the name Anders. I did not know the name on other children she had. I did not know his age, where he worked, where he lived , how he was like etc. She used words that described him as a good person but also said some words I perceived as negative.  

 
Someone who committed datacrimes used a keylogger software or a screenrecorder to steal data that included a text with the name “Anders” 

After May 2011 when I had started to suspect that I had been victim of a datacrime I had no idea about how it had happened, about how long it had been going on  and about what kind of data someone had got hold of. 
It has taken time to understand how and for how long. I can say for sure that they have got hold of both deleted, unsaved and unshared data on my side. They did so either by using a keylogger software or by “mirroring” my PC screen (without my awareness of it) and by using a screenrecorder.  
Some of the deleted and trashed data had to do with him.  I had no idea how Anders Behring Breivik was as person before, in or after 2007 before 22nd July 2011. I had never met him and never communicated with him so I couldn’t really know. What I typed privately about a person with the name Anders was a matter of just “reflection” and “thinking” and some of it was typed in the context of that I was thinking of reasons for crime and terrorism. Words I typed such as “I could do that or that” was a matter of typing in such context. It was not a matter of planning to do anything wrong but a matter of thinking hypothetically what I could do in the context of what I sat thinking about “what could be psychological reasons for crime and terrorism?”. I for example typed “I could contact Anders..”. I never meant that someone with the name Anders was a “potential  terrorist” and never contacted any Anders in such context but someone got hold of these words and either misinterpreted and played on them in a way that caused problems, or abused different words in a way that provoked Breivik.  

The crimes that were committed by people who committed the datacrimes  
 
Someone got hold of these words I typed through a datacrime they committed against me, and later abused words in a way that insulted and hurt Breivik emotionally. Many people have used the words “homo” or “gay” about other men not having anything to do with their sexual nature.  

My PC was my work tool and of course also an emotional tool in a way. What I typed was private and I had every right to type in free ways just like a person is allowed to think free. Once probably annoyed at someone I typed without really meaning it that Anders is probably gay. That had nothing to do with Anders. It was a matter typing privately just to deal with own emotions I had for different reasons. What I typed was also sometimes a matter of words I had heard other people say that I wouldn’t have used myself in a  kind of reflection without thinking much about the meaning of the words.  
I would of course never have communicated such words about Anders to him or to anyone else.  
I also typed some words about  words used by the mother about him, during the short conversation on the veranda, that I perceived as negative.  

I assume that a person who committed datacrime against me then abused the words in a way that hurt him emotionally and provoked him. The question is who it was and how it happened. On my side this was deleted, private and unshared data typed on a pc with a secure and respected firewall and probably without a network cable connecting my pc to the internet. I normally unplugged the cable while typing privately and didn’t use wifi.  

Every person has strengths and weaknesses and naturally it  therefore happens that people can say words about people they love that can be perceived as  
negative by persons the words are about if they hear the words.  
Words can also be misinterpreted. Anders’ mother of course loved her son like mothers normally love their children even though they like every family had their private struggles.  

I think one can assume that someone who committed datacrime against me communicated such words from my pc to him in a way. It is a tragedy if that happened and of course both a crime against Breivik and a crime against me.  

After I started suspecting that I had been victim of datacrimes in May 2011, and especially after 22nd July, I thought more about memories I had of private keystrokes linked to data I had deleted and never shared with anyone. My memories were “blocked” in a way because of the fear I lived with linked to a police case I filed in May 2011, and because my attention first of all was directed towards “survival now” and work, and not at thinking back at memories. The memories I had gave me fear concerning the neighbour I had reported to police.  

The datacrimes committed against me, and how data from the crime was abused, was somehow relevant to understand the motives of Anders Behring Breivik and for why 22nd July happened but was also relevant for the Martine case and very likely also for the Vegard Bjerck case both in 2008. In 2008 I had no idea someone connected to and had an access to my PC and no idea someone abused deleted data from my keystrokes. That was unthinkable for me in 2008. It has taken time to comprehend this and to work out the words (that “do not come for free”). 

After I suspected I had been victim of a datacrime in second half of May 2011 based on details in words the neighbour expressed on 12th may or after midnight  I first of all feared for my life days and weeks after. But I also became conscious of then that I could have been victim of a kind of datacrime. I had a problem with understanding why my life suddenly was in danger. I understood that the value of the sports project I worked on could be high and very high if we had managed to complete the project and make an operable and usable system and website. But I had a difficulty understanding that it could be reason to kill me. I also had a problem with understanding other possible reasons because I had done nothing wrong and had no evil plans. I started suspecting it had to do with the datacrimes I had been victim of and with the data someone got hold of. I did not understand how someone who then connected to my PC then still connected to my PC and abused data from my private keystrokes tactically in a robbery attempt with the motive of taking control over the project I worked on. 

About two months after I had reported the neighbour to police and had filed the police case being about that my life was in danger I had moved twice. The police case had been shelved by mistake after a week after it was registered on 6th June 2011. The 22nd July attack then happened. The keys I had typed linked to unshared data I had deleted more than a year before was more or less forgotten. The deleted data was no plans on my side  but had to do with thinking about psychological reasons for crime and terrorism, and what I “could have done” in such context. I never shared nor talked with anyone about the words I typed. 
I knew little or nothing about causes of terrorism then. I used a respected firewall when connected to the internet and other software I thought could increase my PC safety and believe I was a responsible and careful PC user. 

When I realized that it was possible or likely that I had been victim of a kind of datacrime and started thinking back at my keystrokes I naturally got anxiety linked to that on top of fear I had concerning the police case I filed that police had shelved. I had just moved and had my project to think about that had to completed for obtaining an income, and I had committed no crime, had no evil plans, knew nothing about plans of Breivik, and had done what I could do with regard to what was going on. 

On 22nd July I had filed a police case  relevant in the case "2 months" before, I had been in contact with a private investigator in June 2011, I had moved and was about to move a second time, I had a person from a company called Protech to go through the apartment I had moved to for getting general advise concerning the uncertainties I had, I had planned to drive my PCs to a company named Ibas in Kongsvinger to go through my PCS in search for parts that enabled someone to connect to them in ways I did not know about and I also think I sent an email or two to police late summer or the autumn 2011 after I had sent a written complaint to police about the police case that had been shelved by mistake and was ignored. I also informed a new neighbour the summer 2011, who was related to a King family member through her children, about that I suspected I had been victim of a datacrime and I more than once “shook my head” in a neighbour smalltalk when I said some words about “something crazy had been going on”. Can’t remember if I used the word crazy in Norwegian but it for sure was insane the way someone could connect to my PC and in that way steal data. When I delivered my PCs at Ibas late summer 2011 at their office in Konsvinger I was very afraid. I told 2-3 people that I suspected I had victim of a kind of datacrime in 2011. The receipt I got from Ibas confirms I suspected datacrime (why would I otherwise deliver PCs there..). What was going on was “foggy” and it was very difficult to understand that someone was willing to go as far as they did to “achieve something” in a robbery plan I was unaware of. What was going on was unimaginable before it all started and for quite a long time for me. It was also unimaginable that they got hold of and played on deleted, trashed and/or unshared data from my PC after 22nd July. 

Why it was not a matter of "ports" and why the Norwegian state and Microsoft may have responsibility  

I did everything I could to stop people from stealing data from me after I had moved the summer 2011. I bought new PCs the summer 2011 and assumed that would solved the problem I had with data theft. On a work PC I then also removed the wifi card and de-activated network drivers in BIOS. Nothing helped. Someone still connected to the PCs I used in a way I did not know was possible. What was going on should have been forbidden by law and shouldn't have been technically possible. An "enemy" got hold of data I trashed and never shared with anyone and has later been used by someone to influence on people to committ crime/terrorism. It was unthinkable for me that something like that could happen. 

When I was outside walking, when I took my old car somewhere or took public transport to somewhere and went to a place for a hamburger or a cup of coffee there were also people involved in the robbery who participated in following my moves quite often, who maliciously and consciously tried to provoke and disrupt me. They were normally young persons and they undoubtedly collaborated with people connected to my PC. They did this because they before had noticed they in that way could influence on what I typed privately on my PC, and a person they worked with or for had a plan to use the data to create wrong perceptions about how I am. That was also part of the robbery. In that way they managed to sabotage me. 

A memory I had to unshared and a deleted text from my keystrokes and from text on my PC screen also gave me an increased anxiety for that there also was a link somehow between stolen data and the Martine case. I then hadn’t worked out the words I have now and then it was more “soup” the anxiety I had.

Now it’s different. I know now that someone connected to my PC over many years without my acceptance and without my awareness of it have committed a crime against me by doing so. I of course had nothing to do with the passing away of Martine in London. But a crime had been committed before against me. According to Wikipedia she passed away on 16th March 2008. 

My memories of the phone call to Wenche Behring was “not present” in my mind the summer 2011. One reason for that was that the call was a matter of only “doing” linked to my mothers funeral. Another reason was that I did not know Wenche Behring, and that I had no idea that Anders Behring Breivik was her son. He could have been another Anders. But as information about the crimes he committed, or terrorist attack, was made public in Norwegian newspapers I gradually got an increased suspicion and awareness of that the woman who lived in the area my mother lived in until 2007 could be his mother. I can’t remember when Wenche Behring’s name was made public first time in newspapers.  Also after her name as his mother was made public she was an unknown person for me in a way. This was a person I only had seen all together at most “10 minutes” in my life before my mother passed away in 2007.  

The summer 2011 I had filed a police case and had concerns that were independent concerns. It was someone who committed crimes against me on my PC who committed other crimes that was relevant in the 22nd July case. Not what I typed privately, deleted and never shared with anyone. What had happened was unbelievable and unimaginable for me in 2011. Something had been going on for a long time without my awareness of it in 2011. I was not ill. I was the main owner of a project that had a very hihj money value, had I been able to continue it. 

The first crimes committed in this case, linked to datacrimes committed against me, was the murder on Vegard Bjerck and the murder of Martine. I did not “link” the Vegard Bjerck case to these crimes in 2011. 
In 2011 I had no idea there could be a link. Vegard Bjerck had, according to a newspaper, expressed to someone that he wanted to warn or “blow a whistle” about that “something wrong that was going on”. That probably had to do with datacrimes committed against me and to do with abuse of data from the crime in different ways. Exactly how that was I don’t know. I first suspected a link to the case several years after 2011. Now I don’t think there is any doubt that also that crime somehow is linked to people who committed crime by connecting to my PC in and before 2008. 

During bank robberies in the old days a lot of things happened from the time robbers entered the bank until they left the bank with stolen money. To be able to stop the robbery police or security guards had to act quickly and correctly.  

The police case I filed in May 2011 was undoubtedly relevant when it comes to crimes committed during a robbery that led to the 22nd July tragedy. Police ignored the case and me after they shelved it on 6th June 2011. In fact I shared correct information with the police authority PST some weeks before the trial against Breivik was over in 2012. I remember well it was written in a newspaper soon after that the trial was paused for some time. That probably had to do with information I shared with PST and the newspaper Aftenposten the day before or day after I shared information with PST. That was not “too little too late”. What was “too little too late” was doings and understanding of Norwegian police. Had they done more and not shelved the police case may be they had been able to prevent the 22nd July tragedy from happening. What I was affected by was not an old kind of bank robbery on a day but a robbery that went on over a longer time that ended tragically wrong on 22nd July 2011, that is still ongoing as long as people connect to my PC and cellphone without my acceptance. 

Sometime after I suspected to have been victim of datacrime I also got an anxiety linked to the passing away of a person with the name Alexander Moltzau who also went to Oslo Handelsgymnasium in another class than I did. I did not know Alexander Moltzau. I also wondered if his passing away somehow could be linked to datacrimes committed against me, and to crimes committed by people who committed them.  
To me in 2011 and for some time after I felt an embarrassment in a way about that someone obviously had got hold of text I had typed privately on my PC. But the words on my side was a matter of deleted and trashed data and were not relevant  when it comes to my true thoughts and emotions. Today I have no problem dealing emotionally with this but in 2011 and 2012 I hadn’t worked out all these words for different reasons. I had of course nothing against Alexander Moltzau who was known to be a lucky person in some ways in the school. I don’t know whether or not he was victim of crime when he passed away.  

All the data someone has got hold of and abused tactically to achieve a “goal” was a matter of deleted and trashed data on my side. I can’t remember when I heard about the passing away of him. I may have read an ad in a newspaper. But in my daily life this was, like the Martine case, just a matter of very small details linked to memories I had to keystrokes “a long time ago” and was therefore not something I thought much about. I rarely thought about this because I had nothing to do with crimes committed by people who without my awareness and without my permission connected to my PC.  

In a way the memories to my private keystrokes linked to data I had never shared with anyone and the fear I lived with from May 2011 for a long time after was disruptive in my life, and the disruptions that was caused by people who connected to my PC have continued because they have not been stopped. In 2011 I didn’t have the words “it was a matter of deleted, trashed and unshared data on my side” because I new less about  what kind of data someone had got hold of and of how someone had stolen data from my PC. Actually I had a bad conscience in a way for words I had typed on my PC as a consequence of crimes people who had committed a datacrime against me had committed, rather than having the right emotions and words “a crime has been committed against me and I have done nothing wrong”. I had every right to type whatever I felt on on my private PC. I broke no law when I did so. People who committed crime did so in a robbery attempt. After 22nd July they had a need to create wrong perceptions about who were responsible in the case and did so. It was surprising that someone continued to connect to my PC and steal data in that way with regard to that I was neighbour then to the person related to the king family through her children, and also surprising that they continued to abuse data tactically probably to mislead investigators and people who could have helped me in completing the sports project. 

When I read about the 22nd July case in newspapers in 2011 and 2012 and about the details in the story, it naturally triggered memories linked to some of my unshared deleted and trashed data. Details in newspaper stories  “indicated” that there could be a link to stolen data but I had no idea of how someone got hold of it and how it had been abused. It was difficult to understand. To me it was invisible. 

I read in a newspaper that Breivik earned money by selling falsified university certificates which of course was not true, thoughts that undoubtedly came from my unshared deleted  data, so I wondered where Breivik got his money from. That also gave me a kind of fear. 
Today I don’t think there is much doubt. When Wenche Behring wanted to take a look at my mother’s apartment it may have had to do with blackmail or manipulation my mother had been victim of, by someone who connected to my PC before 2007. That also explains her passing away even though she suffered in some ways. Someone involved in manipulation or blackmail encouraged her to take her life. This was irrelevant in the 22nd July case but a crime that was committed against our mother and our family if that was how it was. If so that was also a robbery. There were no traces of that she had given away money to someone outside our family in 2007 and 2008 when my brother, sister and my half brother shared inheritance from her. Money we got from her came from her inheritance from her mother and father, and everything was reported to Norwegian tax authorities. The only trace in my memories had to do with something she said some years before concerning the conflict between her sister and the sister’s husband, and memories to deleted text I had typed about that. It is possible that she had an account family did not know about, also then money from a legal source, and that robbers blackmailed her to get hold of money on that account. It may also be that she hadn't.  

Our mother’s goodhearted and careful way of being, with her personal problems, children and also grandchildren she would never have done something relevant when it comes to crimes Breivik and people he collaborated with committed. Had she been “angry” at the hospital that mistreated her with wrong medicine for too long several times she would have done something against people at the hospital. It is very psychotic to think otherwise. It would surprise me if someone is able to find a psychologist in the world who disagree with that. Important to repeat that people at the hospital also helped her in some ways. But unfortunately in a way that caused more problems for her and for our family sometimes.  

The crimes by the people who committed the datacrimes that led to the the 22nd July tragedy  

It was undoubtably someone present at Utoya who had abused data from the datacrime that made Breivik attack people at Utoya. Someone who abused data in blog or in another way who made him angry, whom he knew was/were going to Utoya, made him go there to kill people.  
The reason for that the government building was bombed was that someone who had an anger directed against Norway somehow influenced on him to drive the car there. That was a way of saying it was an attack on Norway, and it somehow undoubtably had to do with the capture and killing of Osama Bin Laden in the beginning of May 2011.  
Had Breivik been angry at a tax office, on a royal family, on police or on another authority the car would have been driven to another building. Breivik may not have understood that. 

If the terrorist attack on 22nd July was not a revenge by someone after the killing of Bin Laden when did someone revenge his death? 

Based on memories I had to keystrokes linked to deleted and unshared data I can say  that the 22nd July plans were made by someone who committed datacrimes against me sometime after January 2010.

22nd July was not about a “nose implant” that enables someone to read a person’s thoughts if such implant exists. Had it been about a kind of implant that enables someone to read a person’s thoughts it would not have been the Government building and innocent people on an island that had been targets and attacked. Targets had then been people in a hospital or someone responsible for giving a person such implant, if someone given such an implant had lost his or her mind as  consequence of it and targeted someone. It is very unlikely that such would cause a mass murder against people having nothing to do with it. Another matter is that such technologies can be very dangerous because consequences can be unpredictable. Everyone needs to be able to obtain a peace of mind without being disrupted by people who have emotions about just what they think. It is more likely such an implant had led to for example a court trial, if someone had been abused as lab rat in that kind of project without giving scientists an acceptance.  

I tried to continue the project after I had moved the summer 2011 but it was impossible to ”get anywhere”  because of people who connected to my PC who also “listened to” and tracked my cellphone. I managed a couple of years after 2011, with clever, goodhearted and honest help from a patent attorney to describe the “engine” or the method for running cups by a server by the means of a real time clock, a tournament time-scheule and interaction of tournament entrants with the server. I was aware of that the application probably wouldn’t lead to a patent but paid for the patent attorney help because I believed it was important to describe in a correct way “the engine” or an important part of our system that our work from 2005-2011 led to.

The system comprised of much more than the method for running cups that  could give the system a high value.  

I think and thought it was strange that no one was interested in investing in and completing the project in 2011 and 2012. Innovation Norway should have supported me when I applied for continued support to the project in 2011. They were in a way a Quisling then for me and the work we had done. It was a project that was very promising when I applied for continued funding. One can say they first encouraged me to “make honey” and when the honey was made they enabled other people/businesses to profit from it. Regardless of that I had no chance of “getting anywhere” because of the criminal minds who still connected to and still connect to PCs I use and to my cellphone, and because of the crimes people connecting to my PC have committed. There has been a lot of manipulation by them. Someone also sabotaged one of my password protected hard drives with important files in the period 2012-2014, someone has deleted a lot of emails I have sent and there has been a continuous abuse of data from especially my PC, either as part of a future plan or in attempt to prevent me from “getting somewhere with my work”.  

It was very unfortunate that I had to move the summer 2011. Also the fear I had after 12th may 2011, for good reasons, was very destructive for my work. It was also very destructive that someone who also listened to my phone managed to sabotage the work relation Anne, the company from Pakistan and I had. I had no chance of getting anywhere because of these crimes committed against me. 

I think Winche Behring seemed like a very normal woman despite the tragedy that happened in 2011. Now it is so many  years ago since 2011 so its time and possible to “put the irrational anger thoughts” behind and be honest about how it actually was. Had Wenche Behring heard about or suspected that her son had malicious plans the summer 2011 one can be 100% certain that she had contacted a doctor, a psychologist, police or probably his father for the son to get a kind of help he needed. The mother knew nothing about the plans he had. Every mother would have stopped their son in doing something like he did on 22nd July. 

Several years of unpaid work sabotaged by the people who committed the datacrimes and other crimes 

I was very busy and focused on the planning of the sports system that was about to be made. I for example skipped family holidays with my father and my siblings abroad once in Florida and once in Altea in spain simply because I didn’t want to “take focus away” from the planning of the system. It was not in any way certain that the “end result” would be good until I felt confident the system plans were good enough and usable in late 2010 and 2011. That was after 5-6 years, after much work with planning on my PC and after many meetings with Anne Cathrine Eriksen. I also bought and sold some stock after my mothers passing away with money I inherited from her (legal of course) and did so with profits in the period. What we inherited was reported to Norwegian tax authorities in accordance with Norwegian law.  

Deceitful lies from robbers and their allies concerning phone call I took to Wenche Behring in first quarter 2010. 

My family are good people. Our ancestors have worked normally hard like most other people and have been people who have abided by laws. My mothers parents were shipowners and my father’s parents had a hardware store in a large brick building of stores they had ownership in with other relatives that gave them a good legal income during their lifetime. 
Other ancestors have been normal respected people in communities they have lived in and not involved in crime. One ancestor was Mayor of oslo for a couple of years. Another was leader of the organizing committee of the Olympic games in oslo in 1952. His family was a family of wellknown shipowners some decades ago. Many more words could have been written about this. The point is that my parents money have all come from legal activities.  

What would have happened if Norwegian police had contacted me the  
summer 2011 concerning the police case I filed in or after June 2011, that was shelved by a mistake on 6th June 2011 only after a week after it was registered?  
That would have been very good! I felt uncomfortable about it but I would have told them police then that I suspected I had been victim of datacrime. I didn’t know how it had happened and didn’t know what kind of data they had got hold of.  

What would have happened if they had questioned all the details I have informed about in this text?  
When it comes to the phone call Wenche Behring Would have confirmed that what I have written here is true. I did not call or talk with Anders Behring Breivik. I did not ask to talk with him. I have never called him, never talked with him, never met him and never communicated something through someone to him. 

What would answers have been if someone working for police had asked people I had contact with in 2010 about how I was?  
People I then had contact with was first of all Anne Cahthrine Eriksen, a programmer and sometimes Liaqat Ali Chaudhary. They had all said that the project we worked on was about to become very promising. They had also said that things seemed normal like they had been during the years 2005-2010.  
That is unless they had lied. 

The only thing that was abnormal was details I noticed in my surroundings.  
There was a woman, who I thought had been a user of illegal drugs, who rang my doorbell to the apartment I lived in fourth quarter 2009 and asked to borrow my cellphone. I took a note of the phone number she called which belonged to a person who had a name probably from somewhere in the middle east. 
After I had moved in the beginning of 2010 there was another neighbor who rang my doorbell. That was after I had sent an email to police in the district about a person who according to his wife was involved in dealing of illegal drugs. He invited me in to his apartment and seemed like a normal person but his behavior was abnormal in some ways. I was not used to neighbors inviting me in to their apartments. I was slightly skeptical, regardless of how he behaved for that reason, but accepted 3-4 times he invited me in to his apartment in the period second half 2010 to  12th May 2011.  On 12th May 2011 he expressed words that gave reason to suspect he had relevant information both about data from datacrimes I had been victim of and about that my life was in danger. I then reported him to police. I had no evil plans in 2010 or 2011 (or after). 

If there had been a court trial, even though I don’t think that would have happened because I think investigators soon would have realized that I had nothing to do with crimes committed by people who had committed datacrimes against me, what would have happened then? 

People would first of all have been given information about the sports project we had been working on. People would have realized that we had done a work that could have a high money value. Programmers and Anne Cathrine Eriksen would have been called as witnesses to testify in the trial. That is what would have happened unless they participated in datacrimes committed against me. 

I would have had no problem defending myself because I hadn’t done anything wrong. But my project had been motive for datacrimes and for abuse of data. 

What if they had been asked about how I was in 2011 and how the project was in 2011? They had answered that the project had become very promising and that the system planned and prototype made could have had a very high money value.  

What would people who have communicated with me have answered if they had been asked the question: Did Christian ever talk about terrorism or crime with you? Everyone would have answered No. 

What would I have answered if someone had asked me what I did in 2011 except for working on the sports project? 

I had engaged a craftsman to rehabilitate the 90 square meter apartment I bought in the end of 2009. I intended to stay in the apartment but people who committed datacrimes against me, and the neighbour, forced me to move in May or early June 2011. I wanted to stay in the apartment and continue working on my project from there. It was urgent to move around the time I reported the neighbour to police in May 2011.  
I believe it  saved my life that I could move short time after 12th May to a building complex owned by my fathers family/relatives. 

What would my father have said about me in May/June 2011 ?  
He had said that I visited them in Kristiansand in May 2011 and that I feared for my life and had to move because of a neighbour.  My father had confirmed that he helped me rent an apartment in the building of his brother, sister and relatives. 

Would I have had a problem if there had been a court trial against me?  
No. I hadn’t done anything wrong. For me a court trial had been positive and it would have been positive for the project we had been working on. Even though it was a serious case.  It had benefitted me and other people working on the project if there had been a normal investigation. 

Data someone stole was a matter of deleted and unshared data on my side.  
Had there been an investigation I don’t think there had been a court trial because I think it had become clear what had happened, I had committed no crime, and had nothing to do with Breivik and what he did on 22nd July. Neither had other people in my family. 

What should police have done after 22nd July? 

They obviously should have contacted me about the datacrime that had been going on and contacted the other people involved in my project in an investigation of what had happened. 

The 22nd July case was a very dangerous case and police did a big mistake by not doing that. There is no doubt that the police case I filed was relevant in the case with regard to crimes committed that led to the tragedy. Exactly how should have been investigated. 

(The fact that police did that mistake may be an argument if someone has acted according to Norwegian law in emergency to protect an own or other peoples lives, even if acts were psychotic if looking back at some.)  

The bullshit and Breivik’s money  

It should be investigated if the details from the trial against the 22nd July terrorist written about in newspapers are correct. Some or many may been have fabricated for a reason may by people who influenced on him. The money "evidence" for example is reason to question: His father was a diplomat. Money on a foreign bank account could have come from him (not unlikely a former diplomat has had money on a bank account in another country), it could have come from illegal dealing of drugs if he was involved in such, it could have come from other crime such as blackmail (quite likely he committed other crime before with regard to the serious  crimes committed on 22nd July), and it may even be that everything written about a money evidence was a lie for a reason, to create a wrong perception about data from the datacrime.   

Not much money was needed to do what he did. From the trial/story told in Norwegian newspaper it was written he had planned the terrorist attack over many  years which undoubtably was a lie. It may have been planned in 2010 or 2011 but it may also have been a quite spontaneous attack linked to the finding/killing of Osama Bin Laden in early May 2011.     
 
As mentioned  I have wondered if someone who stole data committed blackmail against my mother sometime before she passed away in 2007, and if someone who did also caused her passing away in 2007, but as far as I know that is not how it was. My family have no traces that suggests that happened and this was not something I questioned in 2007.  

Datacrimes someone committed very likely had to do with both the murder on Vegard Bjerck and Martine in London in 2007/2008. Vegard Bjerck had according to a newspaper said to someone that he intended to warn someone or tell someone about something “not good” that was going on. If someone committed blackmail, and also caused my mother’s passing away for example, someone afraid of being revealed would have a murder motive against both Vegard Bjerck and Martine. That for example could have been a motive for both the Martine murder and the Vegard Bjerck murder, if money came from blackmail of my mother. My mother certainly never gave money to anyone for someone to committ terrorism. If Breivik somehow got money from her it had to do with someone who committed datacrimes against me. I don’t know where Breivik got his money from.

Wenche Behring and Martine's mother

I suspect it was no co-incidence from Wenche Behring's side that she and my mother said hallo to each other sometimes in the neighbourhood.

I suspect it had to do with the sports project I had started working on. One of many questions I have asked myself after 2011 is if Wenche Behring and Martine's mother were related. Why have I asked myself this question? After I realized that someone had stolen all output of my keystrokes including trashed and unshared data I know that a person involved in the committed datacrime had to do with her passing away. Martine came from the Asker district and when looking at photo(s) of Martine’s mother and Wenche Behring (I of course remember how Wenche Behring looked like) that can/could be found in Google images I think there are some physical similarities in their looks.

If they were related and Martine was related to Anders Behring Breivik that of course partly explains Breivik anger, hate and motive against the people responsible for datacrimes committed.

These details need to be investigated to be able to find the answer on Breivik’s true motives.

From my mother’s side it was a co-incidence that they sometimes said hallo. I had no idea who Martine was (another woman with the name Martine worked a same place as me in 2007).

It is also known through the web that Breivik's father worked as Norwegian diplomat in Britain for some time. That may explain why something has developed wrong before and/or after 22nd July.

The motive for why Martine was murdered had nothing to do with what I typed. Motives is quite easy to understand. If someone spits you in the face you don't cross the street and spit back at someone who had nothing to do with the spitting. One can certainly assume that someone either felt seriously threatened by Martine (someone was afraid of ending up in prison for a long time or get killed for a reason) or that Martine did something that made someone "spit back at her". No person is killed because they just look like a person for example, unless someone kills a wrong person because they mixes identity (probably almost never happens). In this case it for sure was no mistaken identity.

Einar Opsahl og Annan Forbes Hennie

There undoubtably was an ongoing robbery that seriously started in May 2011. Einar Opsahl was, unless newspapers have lied, shot dead in Oslo on 15th June 2011. I remember that well because it was on my birthday, and because I lived with strong fear those days. I had understood that something was wrong, had strong fear and was careful. I did not see that his death had to do with datacrimes commited against me. How could I?  This is something I have reasoned later based on details such as that he was from the Asker district which I believe was a kind of epicenter when it comes to datacrimes committed, on a memory to a kind of marketing card I once years before received in my mail box that I think had Einar Opsahl's name on it (It made me curious so I after did a search in a search engine), and because it is very abnormal that people are shot and killed in Oslo.

It is possible to understand that acts of people somehow may have to do with each other. Did Einar Opsahl know Annan Forbes Hennie?

Earlier on the day Einar Opsahl was killed I had met some of my family members in a cafe at Lysaker Brygge on the border of Oslo and Baerum. Annan Forbes Hennie died in a parachute "accident" late summer 2011 after 22nd July. He undoubtably had made a name change linked to the robbery of my project. Annan had to do with a photo showing the presence of Kofi Annan on a meeting at the home of the Norwegian Crown prince and Crown princess where many other wellknown people were present, and Forbes was probably about getting or being rich. Their passing aways undoubtably has to do with acts of people who commited the datacrimes and the 22nd July tragedy.

Henrik Thidemandsen and Noka Securities

I moved in June 2011 because of contents in the police case against my neighbour who undoubtably was involved in a wrong doing. I first moved to Stabekk near Oslo and later to an apartment I bought at Snaroya near Oslo in July 2011. My move had nothing to do with new neighbours.

But, someone who connected to my PC(s) before I bought the apartment has manipulated things, and may have made available for sale the apartment I bought at Snaoya during the time I looked at apartment for sale on the internet. The motive of the manipulation was my sports project and it was linked to the ongoing robbery. 

One of the new neighbours at Snaroya who lived over the apartment I lived in had the name Henrik Thidemandsen.
IF he worked for Noka Securities before 1996 it is reason to believe that Bengt Almgren has/had information about the datacrimes someone committed against me. Regardless of this both may have information in the case.

A police authority should have confirmed in 2011 or 2012 that I had been victim of a datacrime.

Enormous difference in typing something privately and sharing/publishing it

Data someone stole and abused was on my side a matter of private, unshared and trashed data on my side. There is an enormous difference in that kind of data and in shared/published data through acts. The difference is like just thinking a thought, for example on a "fear thought" people can have because they think "that must not happen" (all people can have special thoughts), and criminal acts. The first may be a natural thought that all people may have and the second could be a (serious) crime.
Law normally determines what is accepted and not.     

A keylogger or someone psychotic spying on my PC in years before 22nd July

A person affected by the Martine case, who had committed datacrimes and other crimes linked to it may have had psychotic thoughts about why Martine was killed after abuse of stolen and trashed data from my PC. The motive for why ill or criminal decisions were taken concerning investigation of the 22nd July case probably had to do with the possible high money value my sports project had in 2011.

Why one can know for sure that someone working for police wanted to mislead investigators and investigation of the 22nd July case 

1. The sports project I worked on and was the main owner of through my company had a possible billion dollar value in 2011 and was an obvious motive for datacrimes committed. Most people didn’t know that. Someone who wanted to mislead investigators knew that. No one working for police authorities has shown an interest in what the project was about which is key to understand why someone first committed datacrimes and later abused data from the crime in different ways. 
   The project is still a great and very valuable project and still, 14 years after, no one has shown an interest. Why is that? 

1. The police case I filed in May/June 2011 was undoubtably relevant in the 22nd July case but was totally ignored. It had to do with the datacrimes someone committed against me before 22nd July. The case was shelved only one week after it was registered in early June 2011. The case was a matter of life and death and even a bike theft case wouldn’t have been shelved that quick. 

1. Many people undoubtably had information relevant that made them witnesses to datacrimes that had been committed. No one contacted me about it and it was never linked it to the police case I had filed in May/June 2011.  

1. No person wants to be “pulled into” a case like the 22nd July case and the attitude of a responsible investigator in such case is that “in this case we must be careful and gentle with people we talk with about it and no innoscent person shall be pulled  into it, and we have to do everything we can to get correct answers for a further investigation.” If a person has not paid his or her taxes is totally irrelevant when investigating such case,  and if there had been uncertainty if money came from someones bank account in a foreign bank a correct approach would be “We assume that you had nothing to do with what happened on 22nd July.. Is that correct? The person had probably have replied yes. The investigator could have continued.. In this case it is extremely important that we get true information and we are not hunting people for tax fraud so if you can give us correct information we probably won’t not do anything about it..Do you know about any bank account of a person that we should know about to be able to investigate this matter? I have talked with my boss and he/she said you do not need to worry about consequences of saying yes if that is how it is and if you had nothing to do with what happened on 22nd July”, rather than a more reckless approach like “we suspect money comes from you and we need to know if you have or have had a foreign bank account. I am obliged to say that the answer you give can get you in prison.” 
   Investigator’s with honest and good intentions would first have contacted me about these details and been gentle in communication with people.  

1. I have shared a lot of information with Norwegian police authorities since May 2011. The most important information has been ignored. Which has been to stop ongoing crimes on PCs I use and on my cellphone someone still committs against me.  

1. I was the most important person to talk with about these details and no one has contacted me about them and asked me  questions. 
    
   How an investigator has dealt with these matters and questions and who they have talked with about different matters is  key to understand that Norwegian police did not want to find the true answers in this case and that someone working for police succeeded in misleading investigators. Someone succeeded in doing so by continuing to steal data from my computer in years after 22nd July. 
   If it was the Norwegian King or Queen who misleaded investigators it may have had to do with irrational thinking linked to crimes committed by the people who committed the  datacrimes against me that concerned a rumor about the King/Queen 30-40 years ago then. 

Seoul 30th January 2024 (corrected  in Busan 16th February 2025)

By Christian Morten Borge 

Copyright 2025 Christian Morten Borge, All rights reserved