Authorities have a responsibility for what their workers do and don’t do. That concerns the 9.11 attack and it concerns the 22nd July tragedy in Norway in 2011.
When something bad happens, such as the 9.11 attack and the crimes in Norway on 22nd July, is can be called “terrorist attack”, an act of allah, God or Satan because the truth is not known to people or because the truth is to difficult to acknowledge by people.
A truth may not be known by people because someone doesn’t want people to know the truth, because a case hasn't been investigated thoruoughly and because people have not worked hard enough to describe what happened with words, or because “the truth” has passed away with people who passed away.
Behind 9.11 for example there were of course motives that people would have understood, even in America, if they had an access to all information and every little detail of many details that made someone want a revenge against America.
Or is there a difference in losing a child, parent, a brother/sister in America and in a Middle east country? If iraqi authorities had fired rockets against America in February 2001 and it killed and injured people would Americans have thought "this is no problem. Let's go on just as before. We don't do anything about it.." Only a very psychotic person would think Americans wouldn't retaliate in a way. So why isn't there an understanding in America for why Iraq probably wanted a revenge, if there isn't? Are they liars?
One can assume that the 9.11 attack was triggered by the February strikes by American and British authorities in 2001, and that they made someone (probably in Iraq) so angry
that a decision to attack America was taken.
I think one can assume that people involved in the attack had strong personal reasons to participate in it. Otherwise they of course wouldn’t have. People (or human beings) in different countries may have different customs, rules they live by and religions but there are of course many common denominators in peoples emotions because of human nature. If someone consciously kills or physically hurts someone “we” love or care about, especially as a consequence of war acts, “we want revenge”. That is a very common emotion people can have regardless of where in the world they are from.
There are many examples that can be used to make a point of that “people are the same” wherever we go. Someone in America would get just as annoyed by someone who annoys him or her, for a reason, as someone who is annoyed by someone for a same reason in the Middle East.
What is known about the February strikes? Do they know that the information decisions to attack targets in Iraq were based on was correct and true? Are they sure rockets hit the intended targets and didn’t hit for example a building with innsocent people?
Can they know for sure how it was unless they somehow witnessed everything?
What do they know about the people who passed away and people who were injured as a consequence of the strikes? What do they know about their families and about their pasts? Was one or more Iraqi VIPs killed? For example someone related to the Iraqi leader? It is quite likely that relatives of the leader had friends in other Middle East countries and that could have motived to participate in a revenge.
What do they know about the identity of the pilots who crashed planes into the buildings on 9.11? Are they 100% sure that someone didn’t fabricate “evidence” to make someone believe that wrong people were guilty?
If the 9.11 attack also had to do with the Gulf war (liberation of Kuwait), which it probably had, in which America was allowed to use airbases in other Middle East countries like Saudi-Arabia and in Jordan that could have been a motive of a kind of revenge against Saudi-Arabia and Jordan.
In the 9.11 attack many innoscent people died. What do people know about how many innsocent civilians from Iraq who passed away during the liberation of Kuwait?
Quite likely many. More than those who passed away on 9.11? Why isn’ there more information available about that? Were some of the people and families affected by the February strikes also affected by the gulf war? I think one can assume that. The gulf war was pictured and shown on commercial tv channels. People earned money on the war. Is it still allowed to show war on tv like they did during the gulf war? What is known about the whole truth for why Iraqi authorities decided to invade Kiwait?
If studying the February strikes and the 9.11 attack, are there common denominators that can indicate that the 9.11 attack was a revenge? For example number of rockets used, number of targets hit or time of day the strikes and attack happened? If there weren't that of course does not imply the 9.11 attack was no revenge but if there were it may be a kind of evidence/indication.
The reason for why I have written this text is that someone who has psythotic thoughts has tried to create wrong perceptions about something that happened prior to 9.11, at my expence, with motive in the valuable sports project I worked on in 2011. I had of course nothing to do with 9.11 and nothing to do with the tragedy in Norway in 2011 but was victim of datacrime for quite a long time before 22nd July, that may lead to a lawsuit against Microsoft.
Still mentally ill people connect to PCs I use and to my cellphone because they have psychotic thoughts linked to these tragedies. When someone is psychtic they normally don't think so themselves, and that also concerns them. I hope people working for health authorities wake up sometime soon because they are very ill.
Seoul, 7th October 2024
Christian M. Borge